- Error in Understanding Traditional Attachment: Leo Gura highlights that the left fails to understand people's strong attachment to cultural norms and traditional ways of life. He notes that intense advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights can deeply unsettle not only the extreme right, but also moderates in society.
- Left Blindsided by Open-Mindedness: Leo asserts that leftists' open-mindedness often blinds them to the closed-mindedness of the majority of people, reducing their ability to understand the discomfort disruptions to traditional norms can cause.
- Pacing LGBTQ Acceptance: He suggests that a more paced approach may be more effective in winning support for LGBTQ+ rights from moderate sections of society. Extreme activism can scare away potential allies.
- LGBTQ+: a New Phenomenon: Leo indicates that LGBTQ+ issues are relatively new, emerging prominently only in the last 50 years. The unfamiliarity with these identities can make these concepts confusing and disturbing for those more accustomed to binary gender roles.
- The Central Demographic: The focus should be on the middle 60 percent of society, who are neither far-right or far-left. Winning this demographic over is enough to facilitate societal development.
- Understanding Resistance to Acceptance: Leo provides ways to understand the resistance individuals might have towards new gender identity concepts, emphasising that it does not automatically classify them as bigots.
- Fringe Identification Narcissism: Progressives' demand for accommodation of fringe identifications such as custom gender categories and pronouns appears narcissistic and unpractical to the majority. This could alienate potential supporters.
- LGBTQ Recognition as Luxury: Leo posits that recognition and acceptance of LGBTQ+ identities is a luxury that only arises in wealthy and affluent cultures. In societies preoccupied with basic survival needs, such issues rarely surface.
- Underestimating Affluence Impact: Progressives often underestimate the impact of societal development and affluence in allowing for digressions from established norms and exploration of new gender concepts.
- Understanding Traditional Masculinity and Femininity: Leo Gura expresses concern about the neglect of traditional teachings on masculinity and femininity in favour of LGBTQ+ concerns. He remarks that 90% of mankind comfortably fits into the conventional masculine-feminine polarity and suggests that societal focus should cater more to this majority. Due to social and biological differences, there could be issues about men learning to express masculinity and women learning to be feminine. This confusion might lead to lack of satisfied relationships and unclear gender roles. While there should be room for LGBTQ+ individuals, it's important to primarily consider the majority when constructing society.
- Raising legitimate criticisms of LGBTQ+ issues: Gura emphasizes the need for nuanced discussions about LGBTQ+ issues, specifically regarding areas like teenagers transitioning and the potential problems with self-identifying in non-traditional ways. He argues that certain aspects of gender, while socially constructed, have been naturally selected and established over thousands of years due to their functionality.
- Social Constructs and their complexity: Gura discusses the difference between practical and unrealistic social constructs. While gender and nationality are social constructs, they align with biological factors and have been functional for a long time. However, he notes that inventing new social constructs may result in less practical and healthy outcomes.
- Concerns about Transgender Transitioning: Gura acknowledges different perspectives on transgender transitioning. While the majority of trans people report happiness post-transition, he mentions a percentage of people who regret the decision, raising the importance of scientific research on the long-term effects of transitioning. He expresses a special concern about younger individuals transitioning due to susceptibility to groupthink and societal pressure.
- Importance of Open Discussions: Gura argues for the importance of open discussions that allow for legitimate concerns and criticisms regarding LGBTQ+ issues. He advises against dismissing all criticisms as transphobia or homophobia, stressing the importance of differentiating between legitimate criticisms and bigoted ones in order to gain a nuanced understanding of these issues.
- Understanding LGBTQ+ Individuals: Leo Gura stresses the need to consider that not all individuals who identify as LGBTQ+ may do so out of a genuine reflection of their true identity. He believes that the desire to feel unique or part of a special community can potentially influence some individuals, especially among the younger generation who are more susceptible to group influences. He emphasizes that more research is needed to determine the extent of this phenomenon and its impact on individual and societal well-being.
- Questioning the Status Quo: Gura reinforces that asking philosophical questions about identity, gender fluidity, and societal changes shouldn't be seen as threatening or insulting, but as a part of evolving societal discourse. He believes that such questions can contribute to a deeper understanding of these complex issues.
- Adjusting Cultural Attitudes: He suggests that certain LGBTQ+ issues may have been thrust on the majority of society without enough dialogue or consensus, therefore resulting in culture wars instead of constructive discussions. He calls for more societal conversations to address concerns and areas of confusion such as usage of restrooms and participation in sports competitions by transgender individuals.
- Conservatism in Minority and Immigrant Groups: Tackling another broad societal view, Gura points out that minorities and immigrants from certain cultures tend to be more conservative due to their religious and traditional values. He uses this to explain the 2020 Democratic primaries outcome, where Joe Biden, a relatively conservative Democrat, won over Bernie Sanders due to a significant conservative Democratic vote, especially from the South. Gura criticizes progressives for not acknowledging cultural values and voter preferences accurately, and for at times, being in denial about the relatively moderate political disposition of the majority of Democrats.
- Misuse of opinion polls by progressives: Progressives are critiqued for potentially misusing polls to depict the U.S. as more progressive than it might be. Public opinion is not solely reflected by policy support but also by cultural values and personal beliefs, which tend to lean more conservative for a majority in the U.S.
- Demonizing of moderates and centrists by leftists: The criticism of moderates and centrists by leftists is deemed problematic because it polarizes political discourse and hampers the ability to form consensus, which is essential in governance.
- Critiques of Congressman Joe Manchin: Attacks on Joe Manchin by progressives are pointed out as short-sighted given the Congressman represents a deeply red state of West Virginia, and a more progressive candidate is unlikely to win in such regions.
- Assumption of support from minority groups by progressives: Progressives are warned against assuming that minority groups, such as Latinos and Black voters, are guaranteed Democratic votes. Many from these groups, who stem from traditional cultures, may hold conservative viewpoints.
- Importance of moderation and compromise in a diverse society: Emphasis is placed on the role of moderates in preventing the escalation of tensions into a culture war or even civil war. The necessity of compromise when governing a diverse population is highlighted.
- Acknowledgement of complexities in government: The task of governance is compared to a difficult relationship where clear communication and understanding of grievances is critical. This perspective calls for compromise and finding common ground despite political differences in order to preserve national unity.
- Leftist extremism as a 'fringe movement': Although progressivism has many good ideas, it is still considered a fringe movement, requiring time (decades) to infuse its ideals into the broader culture. The importance of moderates in keeping the society stable in the interim cannot be overstated.
- Critique of leftists' demonization of lower stages of development: Leftists are criticized for demonizing lower stages of development without fully embodying them, lacking a full understanding of their importance. It's encouraged they appreciate valid concerns of right-wing perspectives and avoid straw-manning conservatives.
- Open-mindedness as a fundamental approach to political understanding: The need for open-mindedness as a fundamental approach to understanding various political perspectives is emphasized. Political understanding is likened to navigating a challenging relationship understanding differing perspectives is crucial in promoting unity and avoiding unrest.
- Engaging with different perspectives: Learning and understanding from different perspectives, even if they oppose one's own, is promoted. Progressives are criticized for creating a polarization whereby anyone not progressive is seen as the enemy, which can potentially hinder political discourse and the functioning of government.
- Danger of demonizing moderates: Both extremists on the left and right have been found to demonize moderates, preventing them from getting anything done. The vital role of moderates in maintaining societal stability is emphasized, serving as a buffer against society spiraling into a culture or civil war.
- Problem of failing to understand importance of conflict: Leftists often fail to recognize the subtleties of conflicts which can be important for maintaining global stability. Unnecessary wars should be avoided, but there's also a need to acknowledge historical and geopolitical contexts.
- Casting moderation as extremism: Leo disapproves of casting moderates as one extreme or the other, barring them as the "bad guys," which creates a polarized political environment resulting in civil unrest. Extremism from either side, he says, is dangerous and prevents the function of political institutions.
- The importance of nuance in understanding political leanings: Leo emphasizes the role of nuance in understanding people's political leanings. He argues that people's Spiral Stage of Development and culture impact their vote more than specific policies. This is overlooked when polls depict the country as mostly progressive, alienating moderate or conservative individuals.
- The role of minority groups in political leanings: The assumption that minority groups, such as Latinos, would automatically vote Democrat is not always true due to their traditional values. Leftists are warned against taking this group's vote for granted.
- Role of Congressperson Joe Manchin: Joe Manchin, a conservative Democrat from West Virginia, is used as an example of valuable political moderation. Despite his criticism from progressives, Leo points out that his ability to win a conservative state as a Democrat is a significant achievement.
- Understanding political extremism: Extremists, whether on the right or the left, view moderates as enemies. This mindset potentially escalates political polarization and may cause a civil war in worst-case scenarios. It is crucial to understand the wisdom of moderation despite the current escalating political climate.
- Challenging centrism: Leo cautions leftists against dismissing criticisms as centrism or moderation. Instead, he introduces the concept of "conscious politics," a non-ideological and non-partisan perspective that allows for nuanced critique of extremism without promoting centrism.
- Critique of the left's approach to right-wing supporters: He criticizes leftists for creating a polarized political environment by casting moderate individuals as right-wing supporters. This approach escalates extremism, leading to a tug of war and a lack of constructive political discourse.
- Importance of compromise in governance: Recognizing the necessity of compromise when governing a diverse population. Because it's improbable to fully satisfy everyone in a population of 300+ million people, compromise is needed to ensure functional governance.
- Danger of dismissive attitudes towards moderate perspectives: Leftists' criticism and dismissal of moderate and centrist viewpoints are flagged as dangerous for creating unhealthy political polarization. This tireless demonizing of moderates prevents any potential consensus-building required for effective governance.
- Acknowledgement of inevitable political compromise: Leftist extremist belief that compromise with those they perceive as morally wrong or evil is selling out is challenged. Making essential national decisions inevitably requires compromise, given the diversity in political leanings within large populations.
- Demonization of Mainstream Media and Prominent Thinkers: Leo Gura addresses the dismissal and demonization of mainstream media outlets such as CNN and MSNBC by progressives, arguing that such behavior is not wise but rather exhibits bias and misunderstanding. He points out that the bias perceived in mainstream media primarily results from the necessity to appeal to the widest audience, not necessarily to cater to specific political inclinations. Similarly, Gura defends the integrity and intellectual honesty of notable figures like Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris, and Joe Rogan who often face unjustified criticism and misrepresentation from progressive sectors. He recognizes certain disagreements but emphasizes how these individuals foster open, genuine dialogue, which he deems essential in political discourse.
- Conscious Politics: Gura elaborates on the idea of 'conscious politics', a non-ideological, non-partisan perspective that goes beyond the traditional left, right and center political alignments. Rather than converging into standard CNN-type centrism or any form of moderate position, conscious politics represents a completely different and more complex viewpoint. Gura stresses that he is not advocating to abandon progressive ideals but suggesting a more nuanced and less biased approach to politics. He criticizes ideological inclinations, whether it's from the right or the left, claiming that lack of development and unconsciousness are the real adversaries.
- Deviations from Progressivism: Gura counters the common accusation thrown his way of promoting neoliberalism or triangulation, presenting himself as a proponent of a kind of 'fourth way' politics that transcends conventional categorizations. He asks progressives to be open-minded and recognize their own biases and ideological tendencies. He criticizes demonization and implies that those who majorly criticize the bias of others often project their own biases. Gura stresses the need for an intellectually honest conversation and calls out the progressives' unwarranted disdain for figures like Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris, and Joe Rogan. He contends that such actions discredit the intellectual credibility of the left.
- Misunderstanding of Mainstream Media: Gura lashes out at the progressive critique of mainstream media, arguing that their business is not to promote any political bias but to deliver factual news to a broad audience. He asserts that alternative media envoys are not objective either and are swayed by sponsorships, thus cautioning against hasty judgement of mainstream media bias. He explains that the real issue is not with objectivity but with the progressives' desire for a progressive bias catering to their beliefs.
- Mental Transcendence over Traditional Political Spectrum: Gura emphasizes the possibility of transcending the traditional political spectrum and shifting to a more evolved 'meta' perspective that encapsulates diverse political views. He suggests that traditional political spectrums are constrained by stages of cognitive, moral, and spiritual development and urges progressives to shed off prejudices and biases to capably engage in this mental shift.
- Failure to Recognize Moderate Republicans/Conservatives: Leo Gura observes that many progressives fail to acknowledge the existence of moderate Republicans and conservatives. This perception error, he argues, is partly a result of heightened media focus on extreme voices and sensational standpoints in both parties. Many moderate Republicans vote for party candidates out of fear of perceived extreme leftism, even if they disapprove of certain individuals or actions within their party.
- Importance of Integrity and Criticism towards MAGA: Gura distinguishes between moderate Republicans/conservatives and narrow-minded followers of MAGA (Make America Great Again), criticizing the latter for lack of integrity and disregard for facts and truth. He praises moderate Republicans such as Liz Cheney who have shown integrity by standing against Trump and other extreme stances in their party.
- Difference Between Moderate Republicans and Trump: He refutes the argument made by some progressives that moderate Republicans are just as bad as Trump because their policies are similar. Gura emphasizes that the value of such moderates rests not just in their policies, but more importantly their maintenance of integrity, character, truth, and a commitment to calling out extremism within their ranks.
- Danger of Demonizing Moderate Republicans: Gura sees the demonization of moderate Republicans by progressives as a self-fulfilling prophecy, pushing conservatives towards MAGA extremism. This denies the political system of a healthy, robust conservative wing, something that he believes is necessary for a vibrant democracy.
- Need to Praise Moderates: He notes that there is often a lack of praise and recognition from progressives for moderates and conservatives who take a stand against extremism within their own ranks. He encourages progressives to acknowledge the existence of reasonable conservatives, and to understand the complexity of the country's political dynamics beyond progressive ideals.
- Recognition of political integrity: Gura insists that it's crucial to acknowledge the integrity of political opponents when they act accordingly, citing conservative public figures such as Liz Cheney who have denounced the MAGA movement. He warns against the idea that all conservatives are inherently 'bad' and highlights the right wing's unethical demonization of the left.
- Misuse of government support: Gura criticizes progressives for excessively relying on government support and safety provisions, from healthcare to education, fearing this leads to societal complacency and lack of personal responsibility. He asserts that while society needs a safety net, too much government intervention generates a soft and spoiled population.
- Neglect of survival challenges: He cautions that removing societal challenges could impede individual growth and maturity, with people becoming complacent due to a lack of obstacles to tackle. Gura points out that contemporary life is easier than ever before in human history, particularly in the US, leading to an overindulgence in material luxuries.
- Downfall of education system: He criticizes the current education system which, in his opinion, is producing undisciplined, spoiled individuals emerging with enormous debt, rather than equipping students with old-school, conservatively valued, successful individuals.
- Impact of politics in universities: Gura expresses concern about the prevalence of identity politics and extreme groupthink on university campuses. He agrees with some of Jordan Peterson's criticisms of university culture, noting that an overemphasis on political activism can be problematic for young, immature students who lack a comprehensive understanding of reality and politics.
- Focus on Personal Development before Making Political Changes: Gura urges young university students to first secure their personal development, career, relationships, health, and finances before focusing on political activity. He criticizes the time and energy spent on political debates, culture wars, and social media arguments as a waste. By focusing on personal growth, students can acquire the power and resources necessary for meaningful political change.
- Hierarchies Serve a Purpose: Gura challenges the belief of stage green, or progressive leftists, who aim to level all societal hierarchies. He points out that hierarchies often exist for a valid reason and serve to ensure processes get carried out efficiently. While he agrees that some hierarchies might be toxic and need reform, he cautions against leveling hierarchies without understanding their utility.
- Danger of Overemphasis on Relativism: Gura points out the potential pitfalls of excessive relativism, a perspective often adapted by progressives and post-modernists. While acknowledging that a lot of what is considered as natural truths is socially constructed, he warns against the resulting belief that everything, including biology or physics, can be completely disregarded or changed.
- Not All Cultures and Value Systems are Equal: Gura addresses the tendency of stage green progressives to view all cultures and values as equal. He emphasizes that cultures, value systems, races, and even genders, have their unique strengths and weaknesses, and are not inherently equal. He advocates for a balanced recognition of these differences rather than an aim for complete equality.
- Importance of Personal Responsibility and Ambition in Higher Education: Leo Gura notes that university students should prioritize personal growth and solid educational foundations over social issues and politics. He emphasizes that the first decade of adulthood should focus on personal development, rather than political activity, which he deems largely unproductive and distracting. He also expresses a need for useful, practical university majors, questioning the growing popularity of studies such as gender studies.
- Acknowledging the Validity of Established Truths: Despite the progressive trend of viewing everything as relative and socially constructed, Gura insists on the validity of established truths. He clarifies that the socially constructed nature of scientific fields does not negate their reality or potency in structuring the world. He further criticizes the view that all truth is relative and asserts that absolute truth does exist.
- Downgrading of moral standards: Our moral standards have degraded over time, which Leo Gura attributes to a shift away from religious traditions. These traditions provided ethical standards, norms, and rules of conduct for achieving greatness and the "good life".
- Influence of popular culture on the value system: Popular culture, particularly mainstream music and media, can contribute to an unhealthy value system based on material wealth, instant gratification, and outward appearances. This can not only affect the individual but also society as a whole.
- Concern over access to harmful substances and media: Unlimited access to harmful substances such as drugs and potentially harmful media such as violent music and video games, has led to societal issues. These access points can make individuals complacent, lazy, and spoiled, and contribute to deteriorating family units.
- Comparison of past and present societal manners: Gura points out that modern-day societal manners are coarser and less respectful than in the past. He underscores the former dignity and decorum present in media interviews and criticizes the prevalent culture of vulgarity, which he sees as contributing to the demise of societal standards.
- Consequences of the commodified culture: Gura criticises the widespread consumer culture that promotes materialistic goals and the obsession with wealth and status. He argues this kind of culture can hinder personal and societal growth and undermines genuine human values.
- Importance of traditional social structures: Gura emphasizes that traditional social structures, like family units, have value because they have withstood the test of time and social evolution. He warns against hasty and drastic reforms in social structures without thorough consideration of potential unintended consequences.
- Difficulty of implementing utopian ideas: Utopian ideas, although they might seem ideal, can be challenging to implement in practice. This is due to the complexity of society and nuances of human behavior.
- Skepticism on workplace democracy: Gura appreciates the idea of workplace democracy but remains skeptical about its effectiveness in practice. He questions whether democratic workplaces could compete effectively with traditionally hierarchical corporations.
- Misconceptions about religion and spirituality: Gura encourages leftists to understand that not all religion and spirituality are regressive or harmful. He articulates that there are aspects beyond secularism worth exploring.
- Secularism in Marxism: Gura challenges the materialism inherent in Marx's economic theories, highlighting its roots in Hegel's idealism. He believes that materialism, common in modern times through Marxism, is flawed in its understanding of reality, which is more accurately described as idealistic. Arguing against Marx's metaphysics as false, Gura holds that spirituality can provide more conclusive truths.
- Idealistic Unrealistic Plans of the Left: Leftist plans, such as banning gas cars or oil drilling, or radical firearm bans, are viewed by Gura as unrealistic in their ambition and simplified understanding of cause and effect. He encourages a more nuanced approach that accounts for total societal impact and practical feasibility.
- Attitude towards Pacifism and Military Spending: Leftist attitudes towards pacifism are understood as unrealistic and naive in Gura's view. He believes the necessity and pragmatic function of military forces cannot be overlooked in society. While he urges moderation and avoidance of unnecessary conflicts, he notes that the military is a crucial aspect of governance. Geopolitical positioning, alliances, and the military's economic impact are also noted in his argument against excessive peace advocacy.
- Understanding Conflict and Violence: While advocating for moderation and peace, Gura accepts conflict, violence, and military activity as integral parts of today's global society. He argues that they serve legitimate functions, are essential for government stability, and act as preventative measures against potential global conflicts. Though acknowledging potential misuses, he defends America's role as the 'world's policeman' to maintain global stability.
- Prioritizing Governmental Spending: Gura elucidates why military spending often takes precedence over other governmental funding needs, likening it to essential household expenditure, such as rent payments. Recognizing the issue with the U.S's inflated military budget, he stresses the importance of appreciating the various economic benefits the American populace derives from such spending. Skewering leftist critiques on this topic, he criticizes their lack of understanding and over-prioritization of peace pursuits.
- Critiquing Leftist Naiveté: Gura acknowledges the compassionate intentions driving leftist ideals but criticizes the unrealistic naïveté and over-simplistic analyses of complex societal issues that characterize some of these positions. He encourages a more tempered, understanding, and practical approach to societal reform.
- Pacifism and Military Presence: Leo Gura points out that overemphasis on pacifism can lead to bullying from others and might invite war. He warns that while pacifism is a noble idea, countries with lower development stages might exploit it. Maintaining a strong military can deter potential conflicts.
- Excessive Political Correctness and Cancel Culture: He criticizes the left's tendency towards excessive political correctness and cancel culture. While canceling highly toxic individuals can be necessary, people should not be canceled for minor offenses. Gura advises against applying today's moral standards retroactively and encourages people to be tougher and less easily offended.
- Lack of Due Process in Rape and Abuse Allegations: Gura warns against the trend of mob justice in response to rape and abuse allegations, emphasizing that these alarms should be taken seriously but require due legal process rather than triggering immediate outrage and cancelling.
- Excessive Environmentalism: Gura cautions against excessive environmentalism, noting that an over-protectiveness of the environment might lead to human suffering due to increased costs in food, gas, and other commodities. He recognizes the need for environmental regulation but advises against causing suffering by prioritizing the environment over people.
- Excessive Regulation and Affirmative Action Programs: He notes the potential drawbacks of excessive regulation, arguing that red tape can impede progress. While Gura acknowledges the value of affirmative action programs, he states that these too can become excessive and inadvertently provoke discontent.
- Abortion: Gura criticizes the leftist stance on unrestricted late-term abortions. He argues that this idea is morally repugnant to the majority of people and advises leftists to be willing to compromise on the issue of abortion.
- Potential restriction on late-term abortions: Leo Gura suggests a potential compromise on the issue of abortion where abortions in the first two trimesters are legal, and in the third trimester, only under extreme circumstances related to the mother's health or the fetus's genetic condition. He believes that unrestricted abortions give the left a bad political image.
- Detrimental effects of violent protests: Gura comments on the harm violent protests, such as those committed by Antifa, cause to the reputation of the left.
- Culture of downplaying ambition: Gura talks about a tendency in culturally socialist societies like Scandinavia where being overly ambitious is discouraged, resulting in creative and unique individuals being 'cut down'. He warns leftists to avoid such attitudes, which can stifle individualism and competitiveness.
- Attempting to impose stage green values: Gura criticizes the left's attempts to impose stage green values (based on Spiral Dynamics theory) on countries at lower stages of development, like Iraq or Afghanistan. He explains that cultural and societal evolution is gradual and enforcing advanced values on cultures not ready for them will not work.
- Constant criticizing and complaining by the left: Gura discusses how the constant criticism and complaining by leftists potentially lead to a culture of victimhood. He points out that society and people can only develop so fast, and it's essential to accept that they won't progress as quickly as progressives might want. Despite the challenges, society must be supported and understood to facilitate its progress.
- Operations of the Right Wing: While acknowledging that there is often noise and exaggeration in the right wing's perspective, there are also valid concerns with regards to issues like immigration, taxation, abortion and the debasement of culture.
- Importance of Embodying Lower Stages : Leftists or those who have reached stage green often neglect fully embodying the lower stages like stage blue and orange. This incomplete embodiment leads to a lopsided development and contributes to a lack of understanding.
- Straw Manning & Contribution to Polarization: Progressives are guilty of straw manning conservatives without attempting to genuinely understand their viewpoint. Additionally, leftists must recognise their contribution to the current political polarization.
- Shadow Creation by Left Wing: The left wing has a tendency to create shadows out of capitalist elements, including greed, ethnocentrism, racism, war, violence, nationality, corporations, guns, traditional morality, environmental exploitation and masculinity. This makes integrating these shadows an essential step towards achieving their highest potential.
- Understanding the conservative worldview: Acknowledging that the right wing has legitimate functions shields against the illusion that it is entirely void or ineffective. It encourages understanding the conservative worldview in good faith without resorting to simplified caricatures.
- Polarization of American Politics: Both extreme left and right wing ideologies contribute to the political polarization currently being experienced in the US.
- Stage Green in Personal Life: Attained stage green must not be a stopping point; there is important developmental learning and insights that can be garnered from embodying stages blue and orange.
- Existence and Function of Right Wing: Right wing cannot be 100% wrong; its existence is backed by some measure of truth in its worldview and there are valid concerns that it addresses.
- Shortcomings of Left Wing: The left wing is generally more developed and rational compared to the right, yet they both share an equal measure of restrictiveness. More so, the left must address its potential contribution to political polemic.
- Individual Loyalty and Being Open-Minded: Having personal loyalties often detracts from striving for pure understanding. There is a need for teaching and learning how to see radically different perspectives which goes beyond current political inclinations.
- Importance of Unbiased Discussions: Currently, unbiased tier 2 discussions on politics are scarce. Such discussions are essential in creating room to challenge normative thinking, promote open-mindedness and enrich political discourse.
- Advanced Work and Open-mindedness: Delving into advanced work and breaking routine thought processes requires vast open-mindedness. This is especially necessary in the political environment that often spirals into closing off to diverse perspectives.
- Application of Multi-perspectivalism: Politics offers practical application for open-mindedness and multi-perspectivalism. It serves as a real-world test to gauge ability in appreciating radically diverse viewpoints.